Ford to Leave Muni at the End of June

At the end of this month, Nathaniel Ford will be leaving his post as the chief of Muni. And in the search for his replacement, the SFMTA is switching it up from their conventional nationwide hunt and sticking to the local candidates with more intimate knowledge of the city's transit history and needs.

Tom Nolan, the Chair of SFMTA's Board of Directors, revealed the leading local choices to be Chief of Department of Public Works Ed Reiskin and Executive Deputy Director and Interim Boss of the SFMTA Carter Rohan.

Reiskin is described as the more popular and likely choice because of Rohan's time spent in Texas, where his family resides. Friday's SF Examiner Editorial entitled "What the City needs from Muni's next boss", explains the need for a chief that is "in-it-for-the-long-haul" with "100 percent commitment to solving the problems." The column specifically criticizes Ford for displaying a lack of investment into his post other than using it as a "stepping stone to some even-larger city's better-paying transit post" as exemplified by his recent dalliance with DC's Airports Authority.

It should also be mentioned that these changes bring some potentially good news for the taxpayers. The SFMTA is looking to negotiate the salary with its next chief, which will hopefully mean that he won't be making Nathaniel Ford's preposterous $308,000 annual salary. Not only was Ford the highest-paid city official, he is also receiving a $384,000 severance check along with three months of $3,000/month family healthcare coverage. On top of that, he will also be cashing in $67,000 worth of deferred compensation and unclaimed bonuses.

Source: SF Examiner

Plaintiff Magazine: Bike Law 101 by Shaana Rahman

As those of you who follow us on Facebook may know, our very own Shaana Rahman recently wrote an article for Plaintiff Magazine in which she outlines 4 key tips to bike law and to representing cyclists.

As explained in the article, the attention directed on cyclist-motorist collisions--and the laws concerning them--is a direct result of the rise in urban cycling.

While I highly recommend reading the article itself, here is a brief summary of the 4 tips Ms. Rahman offers:

1. Remember that the California Vehicle Code applies to cyclists: "It is important to ascertain whether or not your cyclist was in a riding position that comports with the Vehicle Code."
2. Get to know what type of cyclist your client is: "The best client will be someone who is an experienced rider, riding a bicycle that has all the requisite safety equipment, meeting the requirements of Vehicle Code sections 21201 and 21201.5 and who is wearing bright, reflective clothing (including a helmet) to maximize their visibility."
3. Evaluate differently each of the 5 most common car-versus-bike collisions: "1) A vehicle making a right turn across the cyclist's lane of travel; 2) A vehicle executing a left turn at an uncontrolled (or non-dedicated left turn) intersection; 3) Dooring; 4) The failure of the cyclist or motorist to stop at a red light or stop sign, and 5) A vehicle or cyclist passing on the right."
4. Identify the other causes of the collision, including defective roadway collisions: "If you can identify a dangerous roadway condition, you will need to pursue a claim against any public entity that owned, possessed or maintained the roadway. If the public entity retained a private contractor to perform the road work which gave rise to the defect, the contractor will also be a defendant."

If you are a regular reader of our blog or Facebook, or even if you have just been in the city streets, you are probably more than aware of how important bike law and safety is becoming. These tips, particularly the 4th, are critically important to follow when defending your client, not only to aid the individual, but to prevent future accidents from occurring by improving the condition in which our cyclists are riding.

Make it your mission to protect and speak up for these cyclists if you want to see some real change to our city.